• phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Valve fucked up but the Verge still broke the social contract regardless of whether they’re legally in the clear or not.

    Doing something just because “it’s legal” doesn’t make it a moral justification. My wife and I have a joint bank account. It is legal for me to take money from it and gamble it all away, the gate is “open” but that doesn’t make it morally justifiable.

    • moody@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Meh, I don’t think there’s anything morally wrong with what he did. What he did wasn’t just legal, it’s literally his job. The only issue is that Valve is now angry at him for their own failing.

      To continue the same analogy, they didn’t just leave the gate open, they literally invited a bunch of people and told them to invite other people. I’m not sure what they expected if not this exact situation.

      • dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Valve isn’t really angry as far as I can tell, or have heard. They’re about as angry as any other person which goes and posts this stuff online: revoking access. If Valve wanted to expand their testing userbase without people leaking it online, they would have sought NDAs and other legally-binding agreements with testers and - by extension - journalists who can test the game.