• John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Andrew is not very smart. Windows isn’t very good, but he is very clueless. There are legitimate things to complain about, but Andrew just complains.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think Andrew might be a lawyer.

      My roommate for a couple years in college was pre-law, and did some internships after graduation but before gaining his own law degree. He mentioned at one point how absolutely and hilariously pervasive it was at the firm he was working for attorneys to just run screaming to IT every single time literally anything was even the slightest bit inconvenient or obtuse (to their understanding). Part of it was the logic of “I bill clients at $800/hr, I am not spending my time to resolve whatever this hiccup is”, but part of it was absolutely also some bullshit power dynamics.

          • datavoid@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I was working with a doc on an IT problem a few months ago… It was a mildy terrifying experience, I would never want someone so ignorant as my doctor.

            • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              I don’t know, I don’t think I want the best IT person in the world performing an appendectomy.

              Just because you’re an expert in one field doesn’t mean you’re an expert in every field.

              • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I don’t think I want the best IT person in the world performing an appendectomy.

                “Okay so let’s start with the simplest thing by performing a power cycle and seeing if that fixes it…CLEAR!”

        • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I was married to a lawyer for years. They have to bill somewhere from 1700-2200 hours a year to stay on partner track. And they can’t bill every hour that they’re working (although they can double up sometimes by using the minimum 2/10ths of an hour). My sympathy is with the lawyer. It’s not a power dynamic, it’s how the firm makes money and what you’re there to do.

          • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Yeah, because being a raging asshole to your coworkers is justified as long as it helps you “stay on partner track.”

            Abusive people always find justifications for it.

            • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Because their continued employment depends on them hitting their targets so they need support staff to do their jobs.

              • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Yup, there’s the justification right on time. They had to abandon basic civility and professionalism to “hit their targets.”

                Thats why they can be abusive, ignore the company process for tickets, threaten their coworkers, whatever they want. They need to “stay on parnet track” and “hit their targets.” No one else has any stressors or requirements at their workplace, just the lawyers.

                Nevermind that the “support staff” make sure lots of people, processes and services work, and may individually be more important to “hitting targets” for the company as a whole than any individual lawyer.

                How about the lawyers “do their job” by interacting with their coworkers professionally? By submitting tickets correctly and in a timely manner?

                Abusing your coworkers is never justified.

                • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  edit: nix this.


                  they never justified anything.

                  they explained.

                  explained why they were raging assholes or whatever.

                  but didn’t justify.

                  • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Nah, that was justification. If only “the service workers” would “do their jobs,” then it wouldn’t have to happen.

                    “If you just didn’t make me mad, I wouldn’t have to X” is abuser 101.