It seems to me that if one can adequately explain the function of their pseudocode in adequate detail for an LLM to turn it into a functional and reliable program, then the hardest part of writing the code was already done without the LLM.

That would be an even more interesting solution for finding new gun-designs for mass-manufacture. Kalashnikov, Winchester, Glock, and Colt watch out!

I built my own 3d printer 👉 👈

It’s a National tradition!

-Not a good one, mind you.

Huh… I- never considered this question.

My contacts list has been growing for 21 years. Very few people have caused me so much distress that I’d found removing them from my contacts to be worthwhile. I only found out about some of my friends deaths fairly recently.

On reflection, as I currently look through my contacts list I think removing the friends that have since passed would cause me more distress than leaving them in there. I won’t be calling them.

you can just say “social media.”

I’ve been studying Arm Aarch32 lately. I have a software development academic background but I have always been interested in Architecture.

Those are interesting analogies. I guess I’d have to agree they are certainly a function of programming whereas I probably should have specified programming languages (directed by text) but then one could argue that the examples you mentioned are merely a language of buttons and other user input. —"Sliding scale " indeed.

It’s not a logical programming language, but markup directs the formatting and general output of content to the screen. -Is that not a function of programming?